Does This iPhone Come With or Without Cancer?

Share

Success can be an interesting conundrum. The more that’s achieved, the more work that’s required to “fuel the fire”. If you’ve ever made a bonfire, you’ll know what I’m talking about.

With my recent regression in Alexa ranking and Daniel’s iPhone purchase, I’ve been considering the advantages of a smartphone myself, specifically for blogging purposes. If I want to keep this momentum going, I need to find a way to be connected and have access anytime, anywhere.

Many bloggers utilize smartphones to manage their sites remotely, from approving comments to retweeting articles. With the seemingly endless list of functions Blackberry and iPhone’s have, could there possibly be any downside?

Only if they were marketed as the iTumor or ChemoBerry.

The research on cell phone radiation has been developing a stronger relationship between cell usage and health affects like brain tumors. Yikes…

Scrolling through the updated 2010 listing, guess what phones top the radiation rating:

  • Blackberry Bold – 1.55 W/kg
  • Motorola Droid – 1.50 W/kg
  • HTC Nexus One – 1.39 W/kg
  • Apple iPhone 3G – 1.19 W/kg

I’ll give Apple credit for being at the bottom of that bracket, but nonetheless the findings are somewhat alarming. The phones we’ve come to depend on, particularly for “business” purposes, could have very adverse health affects that we don’t understand yet.

Given the profitable business of telecommunications, it may take many years to fully acknowledge or even reverse the issues similar to what was experienced with Big Tobacco, and currently the Automotive industry.

Earlier I wrote an article deriving Financial Lessons From Engineering. Purposely omitted was the actual list of greatest engineering achievements identified. Why? Because it included technologies like petrochemical and nuclear. Heralded at the time (and still should be) as incredible advancements propelling society to new heights, the technologies’ benefits are now being seriously questioned.

Engineering, along with finances, are not exacting sciences. You take the information readily available at the time along with whatever historical data and make the best possible decision.

No technology, nor financial investment, is infallible.

There will always be unintended consequences.

Remember index funds were an evolution of the mutual fund to combat high fees, and only developed within the last century (1970s) while ETFs were born from the indexes even more recently (1990s) and originally intended for institutional traders.

Therein lies the important connection to personal finance. There will always be unintended consequences of any investment vehicle developed, by private interests, government, or other. The most important aspect is the ability to accept the tides of change, reflect/learn from each experience, then adapt/evolve so you can move forward.

So, to close with a little anecdote. The next time someone’s blabbing away on their smartphone while you’re enjoying a cold one at the local watering hole and just tell them,

Hey buddy – you mind taking that second-hand radiation outside?”

About the author

12 Responses
    1. Fin Engr

      @ Forest:

      Generally, not for being on the laptop, but probably with WiFi. If you check out the link, the concern over cell phones is the electro-juice during transmission.

      And since the outputs are relatively low, its also the proximity to your body. So unless you type with your head 3″ from the screen – should be fine.

      Of course, I’m no expert on the matter – just my take ;)

  1. I just counter the radiation with my tin-foil cap. ;-)

    Seriously though, you’re right. I often wonder what the long-term effects of many different products will be, particularly the kinds of products we use everyday. For example, my deodorant was beginning to irritate my skin, so I switched to a brand that didn’t contain aluminum. I didn’t even know my deodorant contained aluminum. Seems like a strange ingredient to include in a product that you rub on your skin everyday. Better to err on the side of caution, I guess.

    1. Fin Engr

      @ Keith:

      Believe it or not, they have already started producing “radiation shields” according to the info I was reading. Yup, I believe it is with antiperspirants (not sure the exact reason), and have known people who also experience a reaction.

      Just like how smoking was marketed to women as a way to lose weight or how viagra was “accidentally” discovered, it’s amazing how things can drastically change from our original intentions.

      By the way – can you send me your email?

      1. Fin Engr

        @ Dr. Dean:

        Haha – yup! Just like Daniel P. mentioned… If he wants mini-Sweating the Big Stuffs – he may want to keep that in mind! ;)

        So what’s your medical take on the matter? Is there validity to the claim or more research still needs to be done?

    1. Fin Engr

      @ Daniel:

      Let’s try and keep this blog PG ok? ;) I had a summer internship where we wore radiation badges on our waist. It was checked/measured regularly to see how much we’d been exposed to and if we’d be able to have kids.

  2. I get laughed at a bit, but I feel the same way! Why risk it, if you don’t have too… I have a crackberry, but whenever I get a chance to put it on the desk in the corner, I do so.

    The fear of ELFs is primary reasons I don’t get my son one as a present!

    It’s good to hear I’m not alone on matter like these!
    .-= Money Reasons´s last blog ..BP Oil Spill, Selling On Bad News =-.

    1. Fin Engr

      @ Money Reasons:

      Good call on the children – that’s where science has the LEAST data and with their developing bodies/minds/etc it’s definitely not worth the risk!


ModestMoney.com Top Finance Blogs

Archives

SSCP   CAS-002   9L0-066   350-050   642-999   220-801   74-678   642-732   400-051   ICGB   c2010-652   70-413   101-400   220-902   350-080   210-260   70-246   1Z0-144   3002   AWS-SYSOPS   70-347   PEGACPBA71V1   220-901   70-534   LX0-104   070-461   HP0-S42   1Z0-061   000-105   70-486   70-177   N10-006   500-260   640-692   70-980   CISM   VCP550   70-532   200-101   000-080   PR000041   2V0-621   70-411   352-001   70-480   70-461   ICBB   000-089   70-410   350-029   1Z0-060   2V0-620   210-065   70-463   70-483   CRISC   MB6-703   1z0-808   220-802   ITILFND   1Z0-804   LX0-103   MB2-704   210-060   101   200-310   640-911   200-120   EX300   300-209   1Z0-803   350-001   400-201   9L0-012   70-488   JN0-102   640-916   70-270   100-101   MB5-705   JK0-022   350-060   300-320   1z0-434   350-018   400-101   350-030   000-106   ADM-201   300-135   300-208   EX200   PMP   NSE4   1Z0-051   c2010-657   C_TFIN52_66   300-115   70-417   9A0-385   70-243   300-075   70-487   NS0-157   MB2-707   70-533   CAP   OG0-093   M70-101   300-070   102-400   JN0-360   SY0-401   000-017   300-206   CCA-500   70-412   2V0-621D   70-178   810-403   70-462   OG0-091   1V0-601   200-355   000-104   700-501   70-346   CISSP   300-101   1Y0-201   200-125  , 200-125  , 100-105  , 100-105  , 1Z0-803  , 400-051   EX300  , CISM   100-105  , 000-106   400-201   642-732   220-902   70-410  , MB6-703   810-403   70-243  , CAS-002  , AWS-SYSOPS   70-462   70-410   2V0-621   LX0-103   70-461  , 220-902   1Z0-144   70-178   70-270   350-080  , 1Y0-201   1z0-808  , NSE4   102-400  , ADM-201   SSCP  , 200-125  , 640-911   000-104   640-692   300-320   350-060   000-089  , 000-017   1z0-808   700-501   1Z0-051  , 70-177   M70-101   300-209   70-461   3002   N10-006   VCP550   70-487   300-320  , 3002   700-501   NS0-157  , 1V0-601   CAS-002